Skip to main content
Pages and Files
SRHR Global Newsletters
Maternal Health Alliance Project
Community Health Worker Initiative
Integrated Family Health Initiative
Adolescent Reproductive Health
Tékponon Jikuagou (TJ)
SRHR in West Africa
All Project Summaries
Key Tools and Approaches
Social Analysis & Action
The Community Score Card
MH Reference Guide
All Tool Summaries
Global Statistics and other CARE Resources
Maternal Death Reviews
Conferences and Workshops
Other CARE Wikis
Child marriage wiki
Health in Emergencies
Health in Emergencies
The InterAgency Working Group (IAWG) for RH in Emergencies
recently released the revised version of the
Interagency Field Manual (IAFM) for RH in Emergencies
. This excellent resource includes the latest WHO approved standards and guidelines for implementing
interventions during an emergency (natural or conflict related). The manual is in English at present and may be accessed at
. The Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for RH in Emergencies chapter as well as most of the other chapters have significantly changed since the previous version and we encourage you to review this manual carefully when developing or revising the country or regional level
Emergency Preparedness Plans
(EPP) and in planning emergency response activities in RH.
Online Resources for RH in Emergencies
are available at
(select library) and
Cluster developed and is testing tools for all health cluster members to use in emergency response. CARE is a member of the global health cluster and two CARE staff participated in a global level training on these tools. Following is a brief description of the manual and tools that may all be downloaded in English and French at
A. Health Cluster Guide
The guide highlights key principles of humanitarian health action and how coordination and joint efforts among health sector actors
working in partnership
can increase the
effectiveness and efficiency
of health interventions. It is divided into nine sections: 1) role and functioning of a health cluster; 2) effective coordination; 3) assessment and health situation monitoring; 4) analysis and prioritization; 5) strategy
development and planning
; 6) standards; 7) advocacy and resource mobilization; 8) cluster
– lessons learned; and 9) standard services and indicator lists.
A set of Core
and Benchmarks are classified into four categories: (i) health resources availability, (ii) health services coverage, (iii) risks factors, and (iv) health outcomes. These indicators may be found at
C. Tools for Data Collection and Analysis
There are three tools for data collection and analysis to be used at various stages of emergency preparedness and response and these may be accessed at
Preparedness and Planning
The HeRAMS and HIS Tools should be used for health including reproductive health and
of rape. In order to maximize the capacity of people with the right skills, knowledge and attitudes to deliver effective emergency responses, it is important to map human resources and health services.
HeRAMS (Health Resources and Availability Mapping System)
The objective is to promote and support good practice in mapping health resources and services availability. The rationale for HeRAMs is that frequently there is:
A lack of comprehensive understanding of resources and services availability over an affected region and inability to track its evolution over time; and
Difficulty with identifying and addressing gaps, inequities and inequalities in the response.
The data structure provides information on health personnel,
and community services. This tool can be used to provide a baseline and may be easily updated. The health personnel data can be disaggregated by facility versus community-based; and female versus male providers.
The HIS allows us to collect data in a systematic way by using a standardized toolkit of data collection and
that is accompanied by a manual and training material to support frontline staff that are collecting and reporting the data. The global health cluster has developed standard indicators that are measured by using the HIS. When setting up the HIS, it is important to keep the following principles in mind:
All implementing partners (MOH and NGO staff should be trained on how to use the HIS in the field and should contribute to planning for transition to development phase
Data should be used for decision making
Data should be analyzed and shared
Initial Rapid assessment (IRA)
The IRA provides a rapid overview of the emergency situation and provides information on the immediate impacts of the crisis, makes initial estimates of the needs of the affected population for assistance, and defines the priorities for humanitarian action (and funding for that action) in the early weeks. It should also identify areas that need more detailed follow-on assessments.
The IRA tool assesses the needs of the affected population in health, food security, nutrition, non-food items, and water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH). The tool includes an assessment form to be adapted to the context and an analysis tool in excel. This tool is included in the CARE Emergency Toolkit and Pocketbook. It is important to coordinate implementation of this assessment with the other sectors of CARE’s response.
The objective of the IRA is to answer the following core questions:
What has happened? Is there an emergency situation and, if so, what are its key features?
How has the population been affected by the emergency? Who is likely to be most vulnerable and why? How many people were affected, and where are they?
Are interventions required to prevent further harm or loss of life? If so what are the top priorities?
What are continuing or emerging threats that may escalate the emergency?
What resources and capacities are already present (e.g., infrastructure and institutions) that could contribute to the response, and what are the immediate capacity gaps?
What are the key information gaps that should be addressed in following-up assessments?
Data provided by an IRA are preliminary, and the quality of data depends on the skills of the assessment teams. The IRA should identify what types of more detailed sector-specific assessments should be conducted, which would then provide more statistically rigorous or qualitatively nuanced details for program planning.
The IRA should be launched as soon as possible after the onset of an acute crisis, ideally within 1 to 3 days of the onset of the crisis. It can also be used in a protracted emergency situation that becomes more acute and when access becomes available to areas that were previously inaccessible due to insecurity, weather conditions or other obstacles. After about 10 to 15 days, there is likely to be a need, and the capacity, to undertake more in-depth, sector-specific assessments.
Based upon recent experiences with using the IRA, UNOCHA is leading a revision of the IRA and other needs assessment tools but until a new tool is developed, I would suggest that CARE offices modify and implement the IRA unless you have other rapid assessment tools.
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"